TL;DR: Under CRA Guidance CG-013, Fundraising by registered charities, fundraising is any activity that asks for a present or future gift of cash or non-cash property, whether the ask is explicit or implied. CRA accepts fundraising unless it becomes a purpose of the charity, gives more than incidental private benefit, is illegal or contrary to public policy, is deceptive, or is an unrelated business. Charities report fundraising costs on line 5020 of the T3010. A fundraising ratio under 35% is unlikely to raise CRA questions. Above 70%, the charity must justify its spending.
If you're an executive director or treasurer planning a gala, a golf tournament, a direct-mail appeal or a peer-to-peer campaign, this guide explains how CRA judges your fundraising and how to report the costs on your T3010.
Fundraising is any activity that asks for present or future gifts of cash or non-cash property, or that sells goods or services to raise money, whether the ask is explicit or implied (CG-013 ¶17). It includes work done by your board, staff and volunteers, and work done by anyone you contract to fundraise for you.
Fundraising includes:
These activities are not fundraising under CG-013:
CRA treats fundraising as unacceptable when it does any of the following (CG-013 ¶30):
What happens if CRA finds unacceptable fundraising? CRA usually starts with an education letter or a compliance agreement. It can also impose monetary penalties (ITA s. 188.1), suspend the charity's receipting privileges (s. 188.2), or revoke its registration (s. 168(1)(b)). CRA's sanctions guidelines explain how it escalates between these steps.
CRA uses a 90% threshold in both directions:
If CRA reviews your allocation, the charity has to justify it.
To measure the split, look at three things:
Prominence can outweigh size. For example, a donation ticker running across a TV program counts as more than 10% of the activity even if it takes up little screen time.
Is the "four-part test" still used? No. Older articles describe a four-part test for allocating costs. The current version of CG-013 does not include one. Use the three pathways above.
When does awareness content count as charitable? Only when it moves people to take specific action. Under CG-013 ¶126, the content must be factual and detailed enough that the audience can take specific steps that directly further your charitable purpose, and it must encourage them to take those steps. It also has to target people who can act on it and be actively distributed to them. Posting it on your website is not enough.
Under-reporting line 5020, whether knowingly or through negligence, is itself grounds for CRA compliance action (CG-013 ¶122). If you find an allocation error after filing, don't refile the return. Instead, correct it with Form T1240.
The fundraising ratio is your fundraising costs divided by your fundraising revenue for one fiscal period. CRA calculates it from your T3010:
Fundraising ratio = line 5020 (fundraising expenses) ÷ (line 4500 receipted gifts + line 4630 non-receipted fundraising revenue)
Line 4500 includes all receipted gifts, even ones that didn't come from a fundraising activity. Gifts from other charities (line 4510) are not included in the ratio. CRA's Guide T4033 explains what belongs on each of these lines.
The ratio is a screening tool, not a safe harbour. A charity with a 20% ratio can still be non-compliant if its fundraising is deceptive or gives private benefit. A very high ratio for a single event can also draw CRA's attention, even when your overall ratio is low.
Gaming exception: provincial rules often allow lotteries and bingos to run at cost ratios of 70% or more. If your gaming complies with provincial rules, CRA will generally accept the higher ratio (CG-013 ¶99).
Yes. CRA weighs these factors case by case, but none of them makes unacceptable fundraising acceptable (CG-013 ¶89).
CRA treats documented best practices as evidence of responsible fundraising (CG-013, Appendix C). The core ones are:
Yes. CG-013 ¶115 treats galas and golf tournaments as 100% fundraising. Report all of their costs on line 5020, even if the event includes a short program presentation. Ticket receipts are a separate issue: attendees generally get a split receipt for the amount above the value of the meal or green fees.
No, as long as the foundation is a registered charity. CG-013 excludes grant requests to other registered charities and to governments, and those costs are reported as administration. Asking a corporate foundation that isn't a registered charity is not covered by this exclusion.
Not automatically. At 35% and above, CRA looks at your average ratio over recent years and at any explanation you provide. Revocation under ITA s. 168(1)(b) follows unacceptable fundraising, not a ratio by itself.
CRA discourages it. CG-013 treats pay based on results as a sign of possible private benefit and misleading solicitation. Its best practices favour paying for work performed, such as hourly or per-call rates at fair market value. If you do use a commission arrangement, document why, confirm fair market value, and disclose the arrangement to donors.
Only if they're more than nominal. CRA treats recognition costing the lesser of $75 or 10% of the gift per donor as nominal. Nominal recognition costs are reported as administration, and anything above that is fundraising (CG-013 ¶108). For example, a $20 gift sent to donors who gave more than $200 is administration. Sent to donors who gave less than $200, it is fundraising.
Yes. CG-013 recognizes that charities with revenue under $100,000 have smaller donor bases. CRA asks whether your costs are reasonable for your community and whether you control them.
Next step: If your fundraising ratio is over 35%, or you're planning a gala or a third-party campaign, have your allocation method reviewed before you file your T3010. Book a call with B.I.G. Charity Law Group.
Sources: CRA Guidance CG-013, Fundraising by registered charities; CRA Policy CPS-019, What is a related business?; CRA Guide T4033, Completing the Registered Charity Information Return; Income Tax Act ss. 149.1(1), 168(1)(b), 188.1 and 188.2.
The material provided on this website is for information purposes only.. You should not act or abstain from acting based upon such information without first consulting a Charity Lawyer. We do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site. E-mail contact with anyone at B.I.G. Charity Law Group Professional Corporation is not intended to create, and receipt will not constitute, a solicitor-client relationship. Solicitor client relationship will only be created after we have reviewed your case or particulars, decided to accept your case and entered into a written retainer agreement or retainer letter with you.

DOV GOLDBERG, J.D. is a lawyer at B.I.G. Charity Law Group and has dedicated his career exclusively to Charity and Not-for-Profit Law for over a decade. Dov guides charities, foundations, and non-profit organizations through every stage of the registration process, offering practical legal advice with a focus on compliance, governance, and long-term success. Known for his hands-on approach and deep knowledge of CRA requirements, Dov is committed to helping clients build strong, sustainable, and legally sound organizations.