When applying for charitable registration with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) under the promotion of health category, organizations face rigorous requirements. Understanding why applications get rejected can help you strengthen your submission. Here are eight common reasons the CRA turns down health-related charity applications:

The CRA requires that health care services and products demonstrably prevent or relieve physical or mental health conditions. Simply offering a service isn't enough—you must prove it works.
Why applications fail: Organizations cannot provide evidence that their health care services or products effectively eliminate or reduce symptoms of identified health conditions. The CRA expects objective proof through recognition by Health Canada, provincial/territorial health authorities, the Canadian Medical Association, or at least three specialized physicians.
The standard: Unless your service is covered under the Canada Health Act or provincial/territorial medical insurance plans, you need to demonstrate effectiveness through clinical evidence, recognized medical authority support, or established clinical guidelines.
Health care providers must be competent and capable of delivering safe services comparable to those in the Canadian health care system.
Why applications fail: Organizations employ unlicensed practitioners without demonstrating how they meet quality and safety standards, or they cannot show that their health care providers possess appropriate credentials and current licensing in good standing.
The standard: For regulated professions, providers must be licensed with the relevant professional regulatory body in Canada. For unregulated or complementary/alternative health care providers, organizations must provide objective evidence that practitioners have reasonable skill and knowledge, operate in appropriate settings, and have protocols to mitigate risks.
Health care products—including medical devices, drugs, and natural health products—must meet stringent quality and safety requirements.
Why applications fail: Organizations distribute health products that lack proper Health Canada approval, aren't listed on required databases (Drug Product Database, Medical Device Active Listing, Licensed Natural Health Products Database), or have active recalls, advisories, or warnings against them.
The standard: Products used in Canada generally need Drug Identification Numbers (DINs), Natural Product Numbers (NPNs), or appropriate medical device licensing. Products for international distribution must comply with World Health Organization guidelines or recognized international standards.
The CRA requires that charitable benefits be direct, necessary, and reasonably achievable—not vague possibilities or uncertain outcomes.
Why applications fail: Organizations propose activities where the health benefit is too speculative, intangible, or contingent on too many intervening factors. For example, promoting "general wellness" or "optimizing quality of life" without addressing specific health conditions typically fails because any health benefit is considered too remote.
The standard: The benefit must be a necessary and reasonably direct result of the organization's activities. Courts have consistently rejected charitable status for assumed prospects of gain that are "vague, intangible and remote."
Services provided purely for cosmetic or lifestyle reasons—rather than medical necessity—don't meet charitable requirements.
Why applications fail: Organizations offer procedures like optional cosmetic surgery, beauty treatments, or enhancement services that improve appearance but don't address health conditions, deformities from accidents, or disfiguring medical conditions.
The standard: Medical procedures are charitable when they're medically necessary—such as reconstructive surgery following trauma, treating congenital abnormalities, or addressing disfiguring health conditions—not when they're elective enhancements.
Charities must serve the public or a sufficient section of the public, and cannot provide unacceptable private benefits.
Why applications fail: Organizations unduly restrict their services beyond what's justified by their charitable purpose, charge fees that exclude substantial portions of potential beneficiaries, or provide excessive benefits to staff, directors, or related parties through above-market compensation, unnecessary expenses, or preferential business arrangements.
The standard: While some restrictions on beneficiaries are acceptable (e.g., limiting services to people with a specific disease), arbitrary restrictions aren't. Medical clinics should generally be available to the public at large, with any limitations justified by the charitable purpose.
Simply raising awareness about health issues or sharing information doesn't automatically qualify as charitable activity.
Why applications fail: Organizations create websites or materials that merely re-post existing health information without adding value, provide vague awareness campaigns without actionable steps, or fail to demonstrate that their information enables the public to take specific actions that directly promote health.
The standard: To be charitable, health information activities must meet three criteria: (1) Content must be detailed, factual, and enable specific health-promoting actions; (2) Information must target audiences that can reasonably act on it; and (3) Distribution must actively reach the target audience, not just make information available.
Professional associations that primarily serve member interests—even in health fields—don't qualify as charities.
Why applications fail: Organizations exist mainly to promote their members' services, market their practitioners, increase professional recognition, or provide networking benefits, rather than protecting the public through health care regulation or directly serving public health needs.
The standard: While regulatory bodies that protect the public by maintaining professional standards can be charitable, groups formed to advance members' professional or economic interests provide unacceptable private benefits. The focus must be on public protection and health promotion, with any member benefits being incidental.
To succeed with a health promotion charity application:
Understanding these common pitfalls helps organizations craft stronger applications that meet the CRA's requirements for charitable registration under the promotion of health category.
Navigating the CRA's rigorous requirements for health-related charitable registration can be complex, especially when dealing with effectiveness standards, Health Canada approvals, and public benefit tests. If your organization is planning to apply for charitable status to advance health—or if you've received a rejection and need guidance on next steps—B.I.G. Charity Law Group can help you strengthen your application and avoid common pitfalls.
Our charity law team has extensive experience helping medical clinics, health product organizations, wellness centres, and health information providers successfully register with the CRA. We can review your proposed activities, ensure you have proper documentation of effectiveness and licensing, and help you demonstrate genuine public benefit that meets CRA standards. Contact us at 416-488-5888 or email dov.goldberg@charitylawgroup.ca to discuss your health charity application.
Ready to get started? Schedule a FREE consultation to discuss your charitable registration needs, or visit CharityLawGroup.ca to learn more about our services. Don't let application mistakes delay your mission to advance health in Canadian communities.
Additional Resources:
The CRA typically takes 6 to 12 months to process charitable registration applications, though complex health-related applications may take longer. The timeline depends on the completeness of your application, the complexity of your proposed activities, and whether the CRA requests additional information. Submitting thorough documentation upfront—including evidence of effectiveness, licensing credentials, and Health Canada approvals—can help expedite the process.
A wellness centre can qualify as a registered charity only if it demonstrates that its services effectively prevent or relieve specific physical or mental health conditions. General wellness activities that promote "quality of life" or "general wellbeing" without addressing identifiable health conditions typically don't meet CRA requirements because the health benefit is considered too remote or indirect. Your application must show direct, measurable health outcomes supported by clinical evidence or recognition from Health Canada or medical authorities.
Yes, health products distributed in Canada generally require Health Canada approval. Pharmaceuticals need Drug Identification Numbers (DINs), natural health products require Natural Product Numbers (NPNs), and medical devices need appropriate licensing. Products must be listed on Health Canada's databases (Drug Product Database, Medical Device Active Listing, or Licensed Natural Health Products Database) with no active recalls or warnings. For products distributed internationally, you must demonstrate compliance with World Health Organization guidelines or recognized international standards.
Your charity can employ alternative or complementary health practitioners, but you must demonstrate how they meet quality and safety standards. For regulated professions, practitioners must hold current licenses in good standing with the relevant Canadian regulatory body. For unregulated practitioners, you need to provide objective evidence that they possess reasonable skill and knowledge, operate in appropriate settings, and have protocols to mitigate risks. The CRA requires that all practitioners deliver services comparable to those in the Canadian health care system.
The CRA accepts several forms of evidence to demonstrate effectiveness. The strongest evidence includes coverage under the Canada Health Act or provincial/territorial medical insurance plans, recognition by Health Canada or provincial health authorities, endorsement by the Canadian Medical Association, or support from at least three specialized physicians. You can also provide clinical trial results, peer-reviewed research, established clinical practice guidelines, or evidence that your approach is widely accepted in the medical community. Anecdotal evidence or testimonials alone are insufficient.
A medical clinic can charge fees and still qualify as a charity, but the fees cannot exclude substantial portions of potential beneficiaries. The CRA examines whether your fee structure creates unacceptable barriers to access. Charitable medical clinics should offer services based on need rather than ability to pay, which might include sliding scale fees, subsidized services, or accepting patients regardless of insurance coverage. If fees are necessary for sustainability, you must demonstrate how you ensure genuine public access and avoid providing services only to those who can afford to pay.
No, the CRA does not reject applications solely because they focus on mental health. Mental health services qualify under the advancement of health category just as physical health services do. However, your application must meet the same standards: demonstrate that your services effectively prevent or relieve identified mental health conditions, employ qualified practitioners with appropriate credentials or licensing, show direct and measurable benefits, and serve genuine public benefit. Vague programs promoting "emotional wellness" without addressing specific mental health conditions may face rejection for being too remote or indirect.
A health information website can qualify for charitable status if it meets strict criteria. The CRA requires that information dissemination activities provide detailed, factual content that enables the public to take specific health-promoting actions, target audiences that can reasonably act on the information, and actively distribute content to reach the target audience (not just make it passively available). Simply reposting existing health information, providing general awareness without actionable steps, or creating content that doesn't directly enable health improvement typically results in rejection.
If the CRA rejects your application, you'll receive a letter explaining the reasons for refusal. You have 90 days to file a notice of objection if you disagree with the decision. Many organizations choose to address the CRA's concerns and submit a new application with improved documentation, evidence, or revised activities. Working with charity law professionals can help you understand the rejection reasons, determine whether to appeal or reapply, and strengthen your application to meet CRA requirements. Some rejections stem from fixable issues like insufficient documentation rather than fundamental problems with your charitable purpose.
Professional associations can become registered charities only if their primary purpose is protecting the public rather than advancing member interests. Regulatory bodies that maintain professional standards, ensure practitioner competence, and protect public health may qualify. However, associations formed primarily to promote members' services, market practitioners, increase professional recognition, or provide networking benefits will be rejected because they provide unacceptable private benefits to members. The focus must be on public protection and health promotion, with any member benefits being incidental to the charitable purpose.
The material provided on this website is for information purposes only.. You should not act or abstain from acting based upon such information without first consulting a Charity Lawyer. We do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site. E-mail contact with anyone at B.I.G. Charity Law Group Professional Corporation is not intended to create, and receipt will not constitute, a solicitor-client relationship. Solicitor client relationship will only be created after we have reviewed your case or particulars, decided to accept your case and entered into a written retainer agreement or retainer letter with you.