TL;DR: No — a registered charity's purpose can never simply be "social entrepreneurship." Under Income Tax Act s. 149.1(1), a charity must be constituted and operated exclusively for purposes falling within one of the four recognized heads of charity (CRA Guidance CG-019). What a charity can do is run a social-enterprise-style business as an activity, if that activity passes the "linked and subordinate" test in CRA Policy Statement CPS-019, or qualifies as a community economic development activity under CG-014, with any private benefit kept incidental.
Social entrepreneurship involves using business strategies to solve social, cultural, or environmental issues. Unlike traditional businesses, the primary goal of social enterprises is not to generate profit but to create measurable social impact. Examples include:
These ventures often reinvest profits into their mission, furthering the social cause while achieving financial sustainability.
"Social entrepreneurship" means using a business — selling a product or a service — to advance a social mission instead of to maximize profit. It is an operating method. A charity's purpose is the legal object stated in its governing documents and approved by CRA on registration.
These are two different things, and mixing them up causes real problems. A charity cannot register with "run a social enterprise" as its purpose. CRA will only approve purposes that fall within one of four categories set out in CG-019:
Social entrepreneurship can be the activity a charity uses to pursue one of those four purposes. It cannot be the purpose itself.
This distinction traces back to Pemsel (1891) and was confirmed for Canada by the Supreme Court in Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v. MNR (1999). CRA and the courts still apply that same four-head framework today.
Once a charity has a valid purpose, the question becomes whether a specific business activity is legally allowed. CRA's answer is CPS-019, "What is a related business?" A business activity is a permitted related business if it meets either of two tests.
The linked-and-subordinate test. The activity must connect to the charity's purpose in one of four recognized ways — as a necessary complement to a charitable program, as a by-product of one, by using excess capacity the charity already has, or by selling promotional items bearing the charity's name. It must also stay subordinate: it gets minimal organizational attention relative to the charity's core programs, and charitable goals — not revenue targets — drive the decisions.
The substantially-all-volunteer test. Alternatively, the business qualifies if approximately 90% of the people working in it are unpaid volunteers, regardless of how connected the activity is to the charity's mission.
CRA has been explicit that reinvesting profits into the mission is not, by itself, enough to satisfy either test. A charity that sells unrelated goods and simply donates the proceeds to its programs does not pass the linkage test just because the money ends up in the right place.
A second pathway exists for charities working in economically distressed communities: CG-014, "Community economic development activities and charitable registration." This guidance lets a charity run programs like microloans, program-related investments, or social businesses employing people with disabilities — provided the activity directly furthers relief of poverty or another recognized charitable purpose, and any private benefit created stays incidental.
CG-014 also gives charities more flexibility in disaster zones or areas of significant economic deprivation, where CRA accepts a broader range of activities as furthering relief of poverty.
To operate a social enterprise, charities in Canada must adhere to specific legal and regulatory guidelines:
A charity’s primary purpose must remain charitable. Any business activity must directly support this purpose. For example:
All profits generated from social entrepreneurship must be reinvested into the charity’s mission. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) strictly prohibits profit distribution to private individuals or shareholders.
Charities cannot operate unrelated businesses. Whether a business counts as "related" comes down to the linked-and-subordinate test described above (CPS-019) — the activity must connect to the charity's purpose and stay subordinate to its core programs. For instance, if a charity focused on education starts selling clothing with no connection to its mission, it fails this test and risks losing its charitable status, even if the proceeds go toward its programs.
Any private benefit resulting from the charity's activities must be incidental — meaning it is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to the public benefit the activity delivers (CG-014). Private benefit that isn't incidental — for example, a business primarily set up to enrich a director or a related company — can trigger sanctions or revocation of the charity's registration.
The examples below are illustrations of how the tests above apply in practice, not case studies of specific named organizations.
Consider a Toronto-based charity that provides job training and employment opportunities for homeless individuals by operating a cleaning service. The enterprise directly helps individuals transition out of poverty while generating revenue to support the charity's programs — meeting the linked-and-subordinate test through its connection to a relief-of-poverty purpose.
Consider a Vancouver charity that runs a community farm teaching sustainable farming techniques to youth. The produce is sold locally, and profits fund workshops and educational outreach — the business activity is subordinate to, and a direct extension of, the charity's educational programming.
Consider a charity in Montreal running a low-cost dental clinic for low-income families. The clinic charges nominal fees and reinvests the income to expand services and outreach, consistent with a relief-of-poverty or community-benefit purpose.
By generating revenue, charities reduce reliance on donations and grants, ensuring long-term stability.
Social enterprises often address the root causes of social issues, creating lasting change rather than temporary relief.
Social enterprises can foster stronger connections with the community by providing services or opportunities that directly benefit local residents.
Charities must ensure compliance with CRA guidelines, which can be complex and require legal expertise.
Even a legally compliant related business can quietly take over. Staff time, board attention, and capital can drift toward the revenue-generating side because it's measurable and self-sustaining, while the core charitable program gets less of each. CRA's subordination test exists precisely to catch this before it becomes a legal problem, but a charity's board should watch for it long before CRA does. A social enterprise that starts consuming more of the charity's attention than its programs should trigger a governance review, not just a compliance check.
Some donors and stakeholders may question the charity’s focus if business activities appear to overshadow its charitable work.
Not every good idea passes CPS-019 or CG-014 — and that doesn't mean it's a bad idea, only that it needs a different legal structure. Two common alternatives exist. The charity can set up the enterprise inside a separate for-profit or non-profit corporation, with the charity holding shares, a licence, or a donation relationship at arm's length. Or the organization can register as a non-profit organization under ITA s. 149(1)(l) instead of a registered charity — an NPO isn't bound by the "exclusively charitable" purpose test, though it also can't issue tax receipts for donations. A lawyer can help match the structure to the actual goal instead of forcing a business idea into a charitable-purpose box it doesn't fit.
If your charity is considering social entrepreneurship, here are some steps to get started:
A charity's purpose can never simply be "social entrepreneurship" — it must be one of the four heads of charity recognized under CG-019. But a charity can absolutely run a social-enterprise-style business as an activity, provided it passes the related-business test under CPS-019 or qualifies as community economic development under CG-014, and keeps any private benefit incidental. Done right, social enterprise can be a powerful tool for sustainable, mission-aligned impact — but it starts with getting the legal structure right, not the other way around.
Starting a charity with social entrepreneurship goals can feel overwhelming. But you don't have to navigate this alone. The team at B.I.G. Charity Law Group is here to help you every step of the way.
We specialize in helping Canadian charities and social enterprises succeed legally and financially. Whether you're just starting out or looking to expand your current charity's activities, we can guide you through the process.
Contact us at the B.I.G. Charity Law Group team:
Ready to take the next step? Book your free consultation today. We'll discuss your goals, answer your questions, and help you create a clear path forward.
Don't wait – start building your charity's future today.
Yes. A registered charity can run a social enterprise as an activity — never as its stated purpose — if the activity qualifies as a related business under CPS-019 or a community economic development activity under CG-014.
No. Under ITA s. 149.1(1), a charity's purposes must fall within one of the four heads of charity in CG-019. Social entrepreneurship is a business method a charity can use to pursue one of those purposes, not a purpose in itself.
It's the two-part CPS-019 test CRA uses to decide if a business activity is legally permitted: the activity must connect to the charity's purpose (as a complement, a by-product, use of spare capacity, or promotional sales), and it must stay subordinate — getting minimal attention relative to the charity's core programs.
Only incidental private benefit — benefit that is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to the public benefit the activity delivers, per CG-014. Private benefit beyond that can put the charity's registration at risk.
Yes, if the enterprise fails both the related-business test and the CED test, or if it produces private benefit that isn't incidental. CRA can sanction or revoke registration in these cases.
Operate it through a separate for-profit or non-profit corporation, or register the organization as a non-profit under ITA s. 149(1)(l) instead of as a charity. An NPO skips the "exclusively charitable" purpose requirement but can't issue donation tax receipts.
The material provided on this website is for information purposes only.. You should not act or abstain from acting based upon such information without first consulting a Charity Lawyer. We do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site. E-mail contact with anyone at B.I.G. Charity Law Group Professional Corporation is not intended to create, and receipt will not constitute, a solicitor-client relationship. Solicitor client relationship will only be created after we have reviewed your case or particulars, decided to accept your case and entered into a written retainer agreement or retainer letter with you.

DOV GOLDBERG, J.D. is a lawyer at B.I.G. Charity Law Group and has dedicated his career exclusively to Charity and Not-for-Profit Law for over a decade. Dov guides charities, foundations, and non-profit organizations through every stage of the registration process, offering practical legal advice with a focus on compliance, governance, and long-term success. Known for his hands-on approach and deep knowledge of CRA requirements, Dov is committed to helping clients build strong, sustainable, and legally sound organizations.